Dark Eden

Standard

Review #15: Fiction

Blogging for Books #2

Dark Eden by Chris Beckett

9780804138680

I was really looking forward to a cool alien characters, scary alien world, science fiction story. This is not what I got. There was so much potential here, but it fell flat.

On the alien world of Eden, where it is always dark and light comes from the glowing trees and lanterns from various alien animals, there is a Family of humans who are the descendants of two other humans (Angela and Thomas) who were shipwrecked on this world. Three others (Dixon, Mehmet, and Michael) were shipwrecked as well, but together they attempted to fix the spaceship and return to Earth to send for help. Angela and Thomas stayed behind to populate this new world (which I guess had oxygen because there was no mention of breathing assistance devices, and this new population probably would never have grown without these devices or natural oxygen, so I am just left to assume this alien planet had a breathable atmosphere for humans).

Essentially this Family has been thriving for about 160 years; they’ve broken up into various communities inside of Family (some named after Earth cities like London and Brooklyn) and are surviving hunter/gatherer style. They’ve grown to over 500 members and are beginning to run out of resources as they have never left this one secluded area where the ship that brought Angela and Thomas to Eden landed. Naturally this is a big problem, and being a population of completely inbred people, they are facing not only their diminishing resources but also physical deformities (harelips and claw feet) that hinder many in their community if not kill them as children. They refuse to leave the area they have lived in so long because they are scared of the dark/cold unknown areas outside and they are waiting for Earth to come back to get them. They believe they need to stay in the same place for that to happen.

One teenager, John Redlantern, starts to deviate from this mindset and wants to leave Family and all their traditions and explore, to really live and make a life on Eden. He gets kicked out of Family for these ideas and his actions and moves on to explore on his own. A few of his friends follow him and eventually they have a group of under 20 people (mostly teenagers) trying to make a living in these new, unknown areas of Eden. A feud between this new group and Family is sparked and killing (as well as other violence against one another) is introduced to the world. There is a rift in John’s own group as well, between John and a few others who want to keep moving on and getting further away from Family, and those who are beginning to worry about what they will find if they keep going and want to go back to Family.

Eventually, John and his group find out the truth about what happened to the Three Companions that left so many years ago, and must truly embrace making a life on Eden, on all of Eden, and stop thinking of Earth as home.

I wanted so much more from this. It’s a true Adam and Eve story, two people populating one world, and the complications that ensue. It’s also a story of new exploration and re-imagining existence. But Beckett doesn’t seem to really examine any of that. He focuses a lot on the language, which has been praised for being imaginative, but is really just how a toddler would pronounce big words. Electricity becomes “lecky-trickity”, radio is “rayed yo”, vehicle is “veekle”, etc. Beckett has his characters double their words for emphasis (the world was dark dark, or John was clever clever). This book as been praised for it’s linguistic uniqueness, but to me it was just annoying. It got better as I read on, just because I got used to it, but as a whole, I felt like he didn’t do enough to make the language new or interesting, especially when some things were pronounced and spelled the same while others weren’t.

There was also a lot of emphasis on sex (which is called “slipping,” I’m guessing a play on sleeping together or having slept with someone). I really didn’t understand it. There was an urgency for procreation in the story, more so since many children were being born deformed, and obviously the characters don’t realize it’s the lack of regulation over who “slips” with who that is causing the birth defects. I don’t think it should have been removed from the book, far from it since keeping the community growing (and the complications of a growing community) are big hurdles in the story, but it was overused as a plot point. When used to further the plot, to complete the picture of this community, their troubles, and their daily lives it worked and was necessary. When it was used as filler and for no point at all, it was excessive and off-putting.

In Dark Eden a lot time went by, and almost nothing happened. Years pass between the start of the book and the end, and all that really happens is that one new group is formed and exploring all of Eden, and the story of the Three Companions gets an ending. Between chapters, months pass, with a line or two describing what changed; animals were caught and trained as horses, babies were born, fences put up and shelters built. And John just wanted to keep moving and keep moving. Most of the story comprised of the new group finding an acceptable place to live, a paragraph or two about how they made an area livable, and then John finding a flaw that allows him to pick the group up and move on. When there were two big conflicts in the story (the Family vs. John’s group, and Earth coming to the rescue) I think there was a lot of excess and uninteresting material. 

The world is also painfully underdeveloped. I wanted to envision this world so much (the cover looks incredible!) but Beckett does a terrible job of describing the landscape, the alien animals and the perpetual darkness. He also uses Earth names (like monkey and leopard) for these alien animals. This makes some sense because the new population got a lot names from the original people from Earth, however, it hinders the reader. I see the word leopard and I visualize an Earth leopard. I don’t think of an alien beast, who sings and throws its voice, and has saucer-sized eyes. There’s an underworld that is alluded to, Beckett has is characters theorize this is where the beasts live/come from, and this is where the light/warm substance that pulses through the trees (creating the light on the world and heat for the people) comes from. But it is not fleshed out, and is yet another aspect of the world that is left up to the readers’ imagination. Letting your audience do some of the work in visualizing your world is good, but asking them to do the majority of the work (especially with science fiction or fantasy) is lazy.

Overall I was underwhelmed. The story was sub-par, the characters were developed but just shy of relatable, the world building was awful, and the eventual climax as obvious. It could have been a great commentary on a society formed from one man and one woman and the inevitable complications and failures of it, all set in a beautiful Avatar-esque world. However, Beckett focused on the wrong aspects of this story and neglected the science fiction element, which prevented anything great from happening.

My rating: 2.5 out of 5 stars.

Don’t take my word for it, read a sample chapter of Dark Eden by Chris Beckett here: http://crownpublishing.com/feature/dive-into-dark-eden-by-chris-beckett/#.U2ghGoFdV8E

* I received this book from Blogging for Books for this review.

 

Advertisements

I Haz a Book Blog Now

Standard

So I’ve finally done it, taken that tremendous leap into the life of a blogger. The reasons include but are not limited to: forcing myself to write, and (hopefully) write often; for friends and family (That’s you!) to keep up with what I’m reading and what I am or am not recommending they read, to get myself to read more, in quantity and also in relation to unfamiliar genres; and getting myself to constantly flex my critiquing muscles. And oh yeah, because I want to be a part of the Blogging For Books community where I get books sent to me for free in exchange for a review of that book on their site and my blog.

Basically it’s a win-win-win. Personally for me because I love to read and write and I’d love the opportunity to keep getting stronger at both. Professionally as well because I’d like to read, evaluate and help shape books for publication for a living, so this will help not only my evaluation and shaping skills, but also keep me up to date with the current market and others’ reviews as well. And finally a win for you, reader, because you’ll also get a glimpse into what’s being published, what I think about it, and hopefully you’ll join in the conversation and discuss what you’re reading and/or share your reviews of the same titles, book nerd to book nerd.

To start off I’ll be adding reviews of books I’ve read in the past, mostly those that I’ve reviewed on Goodreads previously. I’m looking to take those reviews and expand on them, getting more in depth with what was working and what wasn’t, and making them stronger, blog-worthy reviews. As I said, please comment with your thoughts/reviews along the way; half the fun I feel will come from that interaction. And also, please, please, please read, share, like, retweet the blog to help me reach as many other book nerds as possible. I’ll keep this one (relatively) short and sweet, and you keep your eye out for the first couple of reviews which I’m sure I’ll get around to posting over the holiday weekend.

P.S. I’m EXTREMELY open to suggestions/requests of books for me to read and review, so please don’t be shy in posting those.

And on that note, I’ll leave you with words from one of my favorite authors, and hope that you enjoy Amber Reads a Book: “Hobey ho, let’s go!”